Fatcow Icon
Our View: No slow burn
Feb 22, 2013 | 2646 views | 2 2 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Photo by Evil Erin
Photo by Evil Erin
slideshow

Golden brown is a nice color — for toast, for flavored coffees, and for pancakes.

Not so much for your birthday suit.

We’re told time and time again of the dangers of baking in the sun, or getting the ‘fake bake’ from tanning beds and booths, yet many of us still seek the light … the light that will darken our skin and make that new white shirt just pop.

Skin that is ‘tan’ is so because it is damaged.

Indoor tanning has been linked with skin cancers including melanoma (the deadliest type of skin cancer), squamous cell carcinoma, and cancers of the eye (ocular melanoma), according to the Centers for Disease Control.

Indoor tanning exposes users to both UV-A and UV-B rays, which damage the skin and can lead to cancer, says the CDC. Using a tanning bed is particularly dangerous for younger users; people who begin tanning younger than age 35 have a 75 percent higher risk of melanoma. Using tanning beds also increases the risk of wrinkles and eye damage, and changes skin texture.

A tan is a response to injury: skin cells respond to damage from UV rays by producing more pigment, say health care professionals.

Keep that in mind as you weigh the benefits of a new proposed state law that would prohibit minors from tanning businesses.

It’s not about personal rights — it’s about health, plain and simple.

A dermatologist told state lawmakers this week that North Carolina youths should be barred from getting bronzed at the local tanning salon because their risks for cancer are too great. Dr. Kelly Nelson spoke in support of the bill that would prohibit tanning parlor customers younger than 18.

The House health committee considered the bill backed by several medical and cancer-prevention groups. Current law prohibits anyone 13 or younger from using salon equipment unless a doctor gives the child a written prescription, while children 14 to 17 only must have a parent’s permission.

Dr. Nelson, an assistant dermatology professor at Duke University medical school, said the rate of melanoma among women under age 50 is growing during an era in which the number of available tanning beds is increasing. Young people, particularly girls who want the summertime look year round, are being needlessly exposed to higher doses of ultraviolet radiation that can accumulate and break down skin cells over time, Nelson told State House members.

“Melanoma can be deadly, particularly if it’s not diagnosed early,” Nelson said after showing images of melanoma or the less dangerous basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma of her patients. “Young people really need protection and that’s what this bill is about.”

More than 61,000 people were diagnosed with skin melanomas and about 9,200 died from them in 2009, the most recent year that figures were available from the CDC.

A committee vote was delayed at least until next week after a spokesman for a tanning salon industry-funded institute argued that bill supporters were misinforming lawmakers about the beds.

The bill is supported by the North Carolina Medical Society, American Cancer Society, N.C. Pediatric Society and the state’s Child Fatality Task Force, among others.

The bill makes sense to us and deserves passage.



Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
|
February 22, 2013
Perhaps a little more diligent research and consideration of the other side of the argument would be valuable when offering an opinion like this. While many medical groups would like all to believe that the relationship between tanning beds and melanoma is clear cut, it most certainly is not. The only piece of research cited in this article in no way relates to tanning beds in professional salons. That study did not find a statistically significant increase in melanoma from use of tanning beds in salons. It did however show that use of unmonitored home units increased risk 40% and use of tanning beds for medical phototherapy, performed by dermatologists, increased risk by 96%. These different uses are lumped together to make it sound scary - and sadly the only one not indicted by the research is the only one being attacked. Now, I ask you, how could it possibly make sense to base legislation on this? And, if it's so clear than tanning causes melanoma, why must they use such faulty research to support their cause? Furthermore, if you look at National Cancer Institute data (http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/browse_csr.php?section=16&page=sect_16_zfig.03.html), you will see that in fact melanoma in younger women has remained steady in recent years, whereas melanoma in older men is grossly on the rise. Can we blame that on tanning beds? Didn't think so. The bottom line is that this research is being based on faulty research, emotion, anecdotal evidence and inaccurate perceptions. It is not based on solid scientific evidence.
|
February 22, 2013
John, the bottom line is that there is NO reason our kids need to use a tanning bed. One person an hour in the US dies from melanoma, and many cases are the result of tanning bed use. If that was your person, I'm sure you would feel differently about this issue. But my guess is that you are part of the indoor tanning industry. I am also guessing that since you don't feel that teen tan ban bills should be based on "emotion, anecdotal evidence, inaccurate perceptions," or the research of thousands of medical experts, the only thing left to base it on is the money being raked in by your industry all for vanity's sake and at the risk of people's health, safety, and lives.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: